3G93

Single ligand occupancy crystal structure of cytochrome P450 2B4 in complex with the inhibitor 1-biphenyl-4-methyl-1H-imidazole


Experimental Data Snapshot

  • Method: X-RAY DIFFRACTION
  • Resolution: 3.20 Å
  • R-Value Free: 0.270 
  • R-Value Work: 0.237 
  • R-Value Observed: 0.239 

Starting Model: experimental
View more details

wwPDB Validation   3D Report Full Report


Ligand Structure Quality Assessment 


This is version 1.3 of the entry. See complete history


Literature

Crystal structures of cytochrome P450 2B4 in complex with the inhibitor 1-biphenyl-4-methyl-1H-imidazole: ligand-induced structural response through alpha-helical repositioning.

Gay, S.C.Sun, L.Maekawa, K.Halpert, J.R.Stout, C.D.

(2009) Biochemistry 48: 4762-4771

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/bi9003765
  • Primary Citation of Related Structures:  
    3G5N, 3G93

  • PubMed Abstract: 

    Two different ligand occupancy structures of cytochrome P450 2B4 (CYP2B4) in complex with 1-biphenyl-4-methyl-1H-imidazole (1-PBI) have been determined by X-ray crystallography. 1-PBI belongs to a series of tight binding, imidazole-based CYP2B4 inhibitors. 1-PBI binding to CYP2B4 yields a type II spectrum with a K(s) value of 0.23 microM and inhibits enzyme activity with an IC(50) value of 0.035 microM. Previous CYP2B4 structures have shown a large degree of structural movement in response to ligand size. With two phenyl rings, 1-PBI is larger than 1-(4-chlorophenyl)imidazole (1-CPI) and 4-(4-chlorophenyl)imidazole (4-CPI) but smaller than bifonazole, which is branched and contains three phenyl rings. The CYP2B4-1-PBI complex is a structural intermediate to the closed CPI and the open bifonazole structures. The B/C-loop reorganizes itself to include two short partial helices while closing one side of the active site. The F-G-helix cassette pivots over the I-helix in direct response to the size of the ligand in the active site. A cluster of Phe residues at the fulcrum of this pivot point allows for dramatic repositioning of the cassette with only a relatively small amount of secondary structure rearrangement. Comparisons of ligand-bound CYP2B4 structures reveal trends in plastic region mobility that could allow for predictions of their position in future structures based on ligand shape and size.


  • Organizational Affiliation

    Skaggs School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of California at San Diego, La Jolla, California 92093, USA. [email protected]


Macromolecules
Find similar proteins by:  (by identity cutoff)  |  3D Structure
Entity ID: 1
MoleculeChains Sequence LengthOrganismDetailsImage
Cytochrome P450 2B4
A, B, C, D
476Oryctolagus cuniculusMutation(s): 9 
Gene Names: CYP2B4
EC: 1.14.14.1
UniProt
Find proteins for P00178 (Oryctolagus cuniculus)
Explore P00178 
Go to UniProtKB:  P00178
Entity Groups  
Sequence Clusters30% Identity50% Identity70% Identity90% Identity95% Identity100% Identity
UniProt GroupP00178
Sequence Annotations
Expand
  • Reference Sequence
Small Molecules
Ligands 2 Unique
IDChains Name / Formula / InChI Key2D Diagram3D Interactions
HEM
Query on HEM

Download Ideal Coordinates CCD File 
E [auth A],
H [auth B],
I [auth C],
K [auth D]
PROTOPORPHYRIN IX CONTAINING FE
C34 H32 Fe N4 O4
KABFMIBPWCXCRK-RGGAHWMASA-L
PB2
Query on PB2

Download Ideal Coordinates CCD File 
F [auth A],
G [auth A],
J [auth C],
L [auth D]
1-(biphenyl-4-ylmethyl)-1H-imidazole
C16 H14 N2
DLYMRVCQTVOYEW-UHFFFAOYSA-N
Experimental Data & Validation

Experimental Data

  • Method: X-RAY DIFFRACTION
  • Resolution: 3.20 Å
  • R-Value Free: 0.270 
  • R-Value Work: 0.237 
  • R-Value Observed: 0.239 
  • Space Group: P 21 21 21
Unit Cell:
Length ( Å )Angle ( ˚ )
a = 86.91α = 90
b = 151.815β = 90
c = 181.583γ = 90
Software Package:
Software NamePurpose
Blu-Icedata collection
PHASESphasing
PHENIXrefinement
MOSFLMdata reduction
SCALAdata scaling

Structure Validation

View Full Validation Report



Ligand Structure Quality Assessment 


Entry History 

Deposition Data

Revision History  (Full details and data files)

  • Version 1.0: 2009-05-12
    Type: Initial release
  • Version 1.1: 2011-07-13
    Changes: Version format compliance
  • Version 1.2: 2021-10-20
    Changes: Database references, Derived calculations
  • Version 1.3: 2023-09-06
    Changes: Data collection, Refinement description